School Bullies     Back Home Up Next

 
 

Home
Up

 

School Violence & The Vancouver School Board

The article shown at the bottom of this page is a reprint of an article from the Vancouver Sun, regarding a violent incident in a BC school.

My Comments
Read the article
See The School Board Rating

My Comments

One of the most deplorable items here is the attitude of the school board chairman Karen Lawrenson, who seems to be more concerned  about the image of the school & school board, than that such violence is actually taking place on a regular basis.

"...the fight ... was no different from any other schoolyard fight except that it was captured on film.  The component that makes this so outrageous is the fact that it was videotaped..."

(Bullshit, Karen.)

This same attitude is shared by other school officials who, instead of praising and supporting the boy that videotaped the incident, are castigating him.

When the boy went to the school the next day with his mother to talk to the administrators, he was told he had given the school a black mark, and he was asked what kind of person he was.

The school board and its chairman should be ashamed for their selfish, self-serving mistreatment of this person, and for the stunning lack of action regarding the on-going problem of violence in our schools.  They appear to be more concerned with their image than with the welfare of the students.

This is a classic reaction by bureaucrats when their ineffectuality and/or incompetence is exposed by a whistleblower.  They blame the whistleblower.

Teen who videotaped school fight ostracized
Friday, December 8, 2000 - Page A1

 

BCTV / Videotape frame shows students at Georges P. Vanier school in Courtenay fighting on school grounds on Nov. 15. A juvenile and an 18-year-old youth have been charged in connection with the fight.


BCTV / Videotape frame shows students at Georges P. Vanier school in Courtenay fighting on school grounds on Nov. 15. A juvenile and an 18-year-old youth have been charged in connection with the fight.


Anton Wallenberg, Special to Sun / Jane Forin, mother of a 17-year-old boy who videotaped a fight, says her son has dropped out of school.


BCTV / Videotape frame shows students at Georges P. Vanier school in Courtenay fighting on school grounds on Nov. 15. A juvenile and an 18-year-old youth have been charged in connection with the fight.

COURTENAY -- A boy who videotaped an ugly after-school fight -- drawing new attention to the issue of teen violence -- has dropped out of school and rarely leaves home because of harassment and threats by other students and the way he has been treated by school officials.

Jane Forin said her 17-year-old son, a budding cameraman, never returned to classes at G.P. Vanier secondary after the incident.

"He's scared," Forin said Thursday in an interview she agreed to reluctantly to let others know how her son was treated by those who thought he -- more than the brawling rowdies -- had given the school a black eye.

Initially, she, too, wondered how her son came to be in a position to film the fight, but after talking with him about it, she was left with far more troubling questions about the response of school officials, whose criticisms of his actions were quick and biting.

After the videotape was aired on BCTV, school board chairwoman Karen Lawrenson said the fight, which included a shot of one teenager screaming that he wanted his white T-shirt splattered with another's blood, was no different from any other schoolyard fight except that it was captured on film.

"The component that makes this so outrageous is the fact that it was videotaped," she told The Vancouver Sun. "The fact that somebody would stand and videotape a fight and not help the person being victimized, I truly believe the board is extremely disappointed that that happened."

Some parents believe those comments were intended to deflect attention away from the fight and the school, which was still recovering from a teacher-student sex scandal last spring.

"Did anyone question the motives of the person who filmed the Rodney King beating? Of course not," said Sue Halstead, referring to the infamous beating of a black man by Los Angeles police officers that sparked outrage about the actions of the officers.

"We always tell kids to expose these things [violence and bullying], but now we're giving them another message . . . that is, if you've got evidence like this, don't give it out."

The school recently ordered students not to take video cameras to school unless they are to be used as part of the curriculum. Comox Valley superintendent Clyde Woolman said that's not a new policy, but it was reinforced after the filming of the fight. He refused to say anything about Forin's son because of a district policy not to comment on individual students.

A youth and an 18-year-old were charged with assault as a result of the fight.

Forin said her son had been carrying his camcorder everywhere since he purchased it from a former employer last summer. He particularly loved to film a friend doing bike stunts, and dreamed one day of a career behind a camera.

On the day of the fight, he had heard a couple of students were going to have it out behind the school after classes and decided to go with his camera, imagining he might capture a shot that could be edited into the bike-stunt footage, she said.

He didn't know the fracas would turn so violent, with one boy pummelling a much smaller kid until he collapsed in tears and a larger boy then pounding the aggressor in the first fight and stomping on his head while he lay on the ground.

Forin said her son came home immediately after the fight, shaken and upset. "He told me he had no idea the fight was going to be that bad . . . and he wasn't sure if he should have been doing that [filming]."

But he had continued filming, quietly, part of a group of about 20 other student spectators. His mother said intervening would have been dangerous, a view reinforced by the action on the videotape.

The next day, the boy went to Shaw Cable, where he was involved in a work experience program he loved and one that was authorized by the school. He showed the tape to a woman employee and she was impressed, telling him he could sell it to a TV station.

He was thrilled by the possibility of money along with praise from one of the professionals he hoped one day to emulate. The money never materialized, but that didn't stop the rumors that he had been motivated by cash from the start.

And neither police nor school officials suggested his videotape would help in the fight against schoolyard violence, by helping to raise awareness or identify perpetrators. On the contrary, police issued a statement saying the videotape had seriously impeded their investigation because they couldn't find witnesses who hadn't seen the tape on TV, and the school made its disapproval clear.

When the boy went to the school the next day with his mother to talk to the administrators, he was told he had given the school a black mark, and he was asked what kind of person he was.

"They were checking his ethics and his morals," his mother said, adding that that was unfair because it wasn't an issue of his morality. But Forin said she didn't want to tangle with the school, either. "I wanted to work together . . . I support the school and anyone who knows me would tell you that."

But her support began to waver after Lawrenson's comments and after she heard from other parents how her son's actions were criticized by officials who attended a parent advisory council meeting around the same time.

She wasn't at the meeting, but Halstead was there and said she left knowing the boy was going to be made a scapegoat.

Since then, he has been mocked, scorned and threatened -- not by the boys who are facing criminal charges but by friends of theirs. He still has a group of good pals, but he's afraid of what others might do, his mother said.

On Wednesday, he went to the swimming pool, where a couple of kids shook fists at him and threatened him, scaring him so that he asked his friends if they could leave early.

Lawrenson said the boy should have turned his tape over to the principal, rather than the media. But Halstead and Wendy Zajac said the community would never have found out about the fight if he had done that. And only through awareness can the community help the school address the problem, they said.

"This is all about the kids and their safety . . . but they [officials] think it's about them," Zajac added.

Forin said her boy hasn't given up his dream of being a professional cameraman, although he's more interested in documentaries than journalism. "He does everything with a passion," she said with a smile, never letting go of something he loves until he knows all about it.

For now, however, he is trying to get through his school work at home, and that work has never come easily. His mother says he will decide next semester whether he can return to school or whether he wants to continue with home schooling.

Go to top

Performance Rating
for the Vancouver School Board:
My Rating System
School Bullies      Back Home Up Next
 

      Legal Notice & Disclaimer
Copyright © 1997-2006    All Rights Reserved    Revised May 09, 2007